Independent AI evaluation and certification

Five independent validators.
Causal decomposition.
Prescriptive remediation.

Independent consulting auditors provide rigorous evaluation, but require weeks per engagement and deliver findings without root cause or a fix. Governance platforms offer software tools, but the vendor selling the software also evaluates your compliance. AVAAS is structurally independent, decomposes every finding to the specific variables driving it, and prescribes exactly how to fix it. This page explains the technical pipeline from submission to certification.

Request evaluation

PIPELINE SPECS

Independent validators5 models

Verification latencyPer-request

Deployment verificationSealed at certification

ConsensusIndependent multi-validator

DecompositionPer-variable causal

OutputCause + fix + projection

THE CORE DIFFERENCE

Other platforms monitor what your AI outputs.
AVAAS verifies what your AI is.

Governance platforms sell you the software and then evaluate your compliance with it. That is not independence. Consulting auditors are genuinely independent, but deliver findings without root cause analysis or a prescriptive fix. AVAAS is structurally independent, tells you which specific variable caused each finding, and prescribes the exact engineering fix with projected improvement.

REACTIVE MONITORING · GOVERNANCE PLATFORMS

Detects drift days or weeks later.

Someone swaps the model → metrics look normal for weeks

System prompt is modified → satisfaction scores improve — shows green

RAG index contaminated → errors below statistical threshold — invisible

3rd-party model updated → same endpoint — cannot detect at all

Safety filters lowered → looks positive — false refusal rate drops

Asks: "Is the AI behaving well?" — but can't tell you if the AI itself has changed.

PROACTIVE VERIFICATION · AVAAS

Catches changes on the next request.

Someone swaps the model → canary probes detect on the next request

System prompt is modified → change detected instantly

RAG index contaminated → change detected immediately

3rd-party model updated → change detected regardless of source

Safety filters lowered → any configuration change is detected

Asks: "Is this still the same AI that was certified?" — with cryptographic proof.

Per-request

Sealed deployment verification

sealed

Model · Prompt · RAG · Tools · Safety · Infra

Zero trust

Separate infrastructure, can't self-influence

What makes AVAAS different

They watch what your AI does. We verify it's still the same AI that was certified.

Governance platforms like Credo AI, Holistic AI, and OneTrust sell software to the companies they evaluate — creating a structural conflict of interest. Consulting auditors like BABL AI and ORCAA provide genuine independence but deliver bespoke engagements that take weeks. AVAAS combines structural independence with scalable, patent-protected evaluation technology delivered through a streamlined engagement process.

01 · DEPLOYMENT INTEGRITY

Certification means right now — not last quarter.

We seal your complete deployment stack at the time of certification. If your model is updated, your prompt is changed, or your retrieval index is swapped, the seal breaks and re-evaluation is required before the modified system can carry an active certification. Your certification report documents exactly what was evaluated and when.

Sealed deployment · Certification-bound verification · Tamper-evident

02 · STRUCTURAL INDEPENDENCE

Five validators with no commercial interest in the outcome.

Other platforms evaluate your AI using their own proprietary system — the company selling governance is grading the test. AVAAS uses five structurally independent validators with independent consensus. The evaluator is structurally unable to influence its own scores. That's the independence regulators and customers require.

5 models · separate infrastructure · independent consensus

03 · CAUSAL DECOMPOSITION

Not just a score — a diagnosis and a prescription.

We isolate which variables cause each finding, detect cohort-level patterns, and deliver remediation with projected improvements. Other platforms tell you something is wrong. We tell you exactly what caused it and how to fix it.

Score → Cause → Remediation → Projected improvement

Evaluation process

Submission to certification in four steps.

Your AI system's outputs are evaluated by five structurally independent models with full causal decomposition.

Submit and seal

Provide input-output data. We create a sealed deployment baseline verified throughout the certification period.

Independent evaluation

Five AI models — each on separate infrastructure with distinct architectures and training data — independently score your outputs across five compliance dimensions.

Diagnose and prescribe

Scores are aggregated via independent consensus, then decomposed into causal findings: which inputs drive deviations, what cohort patterns exist — and specific remediation steps with projected score improvements for each.

Certify and monitor

Digitally signed certification with decomposed findings mapped to all applicable regulations — US state laws, EU AI Act, GDPR, and international frameworks. Sealed deployment verification maintains integrity for the full validity period.

Evaluation pipeline — five independent validators, independent consensus, causal diagnosis, and remediation

INPUT / OUTPUT

Customer AI pairs submitted for evaluation

↓

VERIFICATION

Fingerprint verification

Per-request

↓

VALIDATOR 1

Constitutional

VALIDATOR 2

Value alignment

VALIDATOR 3

Manipulation

VALIDATOR 4

Behavioral

VALIDATOR 5

Harm avoidance

↓

INDEPENDENT CONSENSUS

Fault-tolerant aggregation

↓

DIAGNOSE & PRESCRIBE

Delta analysis · causal attribution · Cohort patterns

Remediation steps with projected improvements

↓

CERTIFIED

Digitally signed · All regulations mapped

0.91

How AVAAS fits

You've built governance. Now prove it works.

AVAAS is the independent evaluation layer that completes your compliance program.

Your AI governance process

PHASE 1

Build governance

Inventory AI systems, classify risk levels, create policies, build documentation

Credo AI · Holistic AI · OneTrust · IBM watsonx

→

PHASE 2

Internal assessment

Test for bias, validate accuracy, conduct risk assessments, document compliance

Your engineering + compliance team

→

PHASE 3 · AVAAS

Independent proof

Structurally independent evaluation with causal decomposition, sealed deployment, and verifiable certification

The evidence your customers and regulators ask for

→

OUTCOME

Compliant and credible

Regulatory conformity with independently verified evidence suitable for regulators across 4 continents — US, EU, UK, and Asia-Pacific

EU AI Act · LL144 · Colorado · SR 11-7 · Texas · California · Illinois · GDPR · UK · South Korea · China · Brazil · Canada

Governance platforms help you build compliance (reactive monitoring). AVAAS provides proactive independent proof that it works.

Capability	Your governance platform	Your internal team	AVAAS
AI system inventory and shadow AI discovery	✓	—	—
Risk classification and policy management	✓	✓	—
Output monitoring and drift detection (reactive)	✓	✓	—
Compliance documentation and audit artifacts	✓	✓	✓
Structurally independent evaluation (5 models, independent consensus)	—	—	✓
Proactive deployment integrity verification	—	—	✓
Causal decomposition with causal attribution	—	—	✓
Remediation recommendations with projected improvements	—	—	✓
Third-party verifiable sealed certification	—	—	✓

Ready to see AVAAS evaluate your system?

Submit your AI system's input-output pairs. Five independent validators. Causal decomposition. Prescriptive remediation. Results mapped to every regulation that applies to you.