Industries

When an algorithm denies a benefit, due process still applies. AVAAS certifies the algorithm.

VA, SSA, CMS, and IRS systems decide eligibility, benefit amounts, disability, and audit selection. When the system is wrong, people lose support they are entitled to, or get singled out unfairly. AVAAS certifies the system at the point it decides for a person.

Due processOMB M-25-21Disparate impactState benefits lawEU AI Act high-risk
Assess your benefits AI →
Where AI acts on a person

The decision point in benefits

In benefits and health, the AI acts when it determines eligibility, calculates an amount, scores a disability claim, or flags a person for audit or fraud. A wrong automated decision can cut off income, care, or both.

When an automated system denies a benefit, due process still applies, and the agency has to explain and defend the decision the algorithm made.

What keeps you exposed

What keeps agencies exposed

Due process

A denial without a real explanation

Constitutional due process does not pause for automation. An unexplained denial is a legal liability and a human harm. Michigan's MiDAS system wrongly accused tens of thousands of fraud at an error rate above 85 percent.

Disparate impact

Confirmed bias in a federal system

A race-blind audit algorithm can still produce a racial disparity. The IRS confirmed that its system audited Black taxpayers several times more often than others and committed to retooling it.

Vendor systems

Tools you cannot inspect

The nH Predict tool used in Medicare Advantage had roughly 90 percent of its appealed denials overturned. M-25-21 holds contractors to the same testing duties, and relying on a vendor does not move the liability.

This is already happening
2.9 to 4.7x
Despite race-blind selection, the IRS audited Black taxpayers at 2.9 to 4.7 times the rate of others, a disparity the agency confirmed and committed to fix.
Stanford RegLab and U.S. Treasury, 2023 · IRS, 2023
How AVAAS adds value

Evidence the system meets due process

Can a denial be explained to the person and a court?

AVAAS evaluates whether the system produces specific, accurate reasons rather than an opaque determination.

Does the model produce disparate error?

Five structurally independent validators test for demographic disparity and failure patterns using causal attribution.

Does it satisfy federal testing expectations?

AVAAS produces documented, third-party evidence aligned to the testing OMB now expects for rights-affecting AI.

You get documented, third-party evidence that an eligibility, benefits, or audit system meets the due-process duties the public sector cannot delegate to a model.

Related AVAAS coverage: EU AI Act · California ADMT · GDPR Article 22. Or run the free Regulation Checker to see what applies to you.

See where your benefits AI creates liability.

Tell us where automated systems decide eligibility, benefits, disability, or audit selection, and we will scope an AVAAS certification to the exposure.

Ready to start now? Certify Your AI →  or  email [email protected]