Your customers' procurement teams are starting to ask for this.
The accountability line is moving from the deployer to the maker. Courts are testing whether the company behind a screening tool answers for how it decides, the EU AI Act places obligations directly on providers of high-risk systems, and Colorado's AI Act assigns duties to developers. Vendors who arrive with independent evidence close faster.
Vendor accountability is no longer theoretical
A federal court has allowed a nationwide age-discrimination collective action to proceed against a major AI hiring software maker, on claims the vendor disputes. The EU AI Act's high-risk obligations reach providers directly, with Annex III obligations taking effect December 2, 2027. Colorado's AI Act, effective January 1, 2027, assigns duties to developers, not only to the companies that deploy them. The FTC has pursued enforcement against companies over AI claims. Every one of these moves the same direction.
When your product sits between millions of people and a decision that affects them, how it behaves is not a private technical detail. Buyers now want an independent answer before they sign.
What unverified vendors run into
Security review grows an AI section
Procurement and risk teams now ask how the model behaves, not just how data is stored. A self-attestation restarts the debate instead of ending it.
Indemnification lands on you
Deployers under pressure push AI liability upstream into vendor contracts. Without independent evidence of behavior, you are pricing risk you cannot see.
The rules name the provider
EU AI Act provider obligations and developer duties in state law mean the maker carries compliance burden even when the customer operates the system.
What certification does for a vendor
Does it shorten sales cycles?
A current AVAAS grade answers the AI section of a security review before it is asked, replacing weeks of bespoke questionnaires with one independent document.
What if the evaluation finds problems?
Findings arrive in the private layer first, with causal attribution and prescriptive remediation. You fix, then certify. The public sees the grade you earn.
Does it cover the product or the deployment?
AVAAS certifies the system as evaluated. Vendors certify the product they ship, and deployers can verify the deployed instance matches what was certified.
The result is documented, third-party evidence of conformity to a published standard at the decision point, issued by an evaluator that is structurally independent of both you and your buyers.
Related AVAAS coverage: Why independence matters · How certification works · EU AI Act · Colorado AI Act.
Check your exposure before you certify
AI Vendor Liability Screener
Find out who is liable when a third-party AI vendor drives a decision that harms someone.
Open tool →AI Assurance Gap Analyzer
See the gap between your current AI governance and what a defensible standard requires.
Open tool →AI Compliance Timeline
See which AI rules take effect when, so you know what applies before the deadline.
Open tool →Arrive at procurement with the answer already in hand.
Tell us what your product decides and who deploys it, and we will scope a certification your enterprise and government buyers can rely on.
Ready to start now? Certify Your AI → or email [email protected]