15 REGULATIONS. 4 CONTINENTS. ONE EVALUATION. — Colorado SB 26-189 (Jan 1, 2027) · EU AI Act (Phased) · NYC LL144 · SR 11-7 · Texas · California · South Korea · UK · China · GDPR — View all →
Regulations
United States — Federal
Banking & Lending (SR 11-7)Enforcing
United States — States
California — EmploymentEnforcing California — HealthcareEnforcing California — ADMT (CCPA)Jan 1, 2027 ColoradoJan 1, 2027 IllinoisEnforcing New York CityEnforcing TexasEnforcing
European Union
EU AI ActPhased EU — GDPR Article 22Enforcing
International
United KingdomEnforcing South KoreaEnforcing ChinaEnforcing CanadaWithdrawn BrazilDraft
View all regulations →
Tools
AI Exposure AssessmentFree AI Assurance Gap AnalyzerFree AI Risk MirrorFree AI Compliance TimelineFree Agentic AI Risk ChecklistFree AI Vendor Liability ScreenerFree AI Evidence Reliability ScreenerFree OMB M-25-21 ReadinessFree Government AI Failure MirrorFree AI Regulation CheckerFree AI Constitution BuilderFree
Tools overview →
Industries
Private sector
Employment & HR Workforce & Gig Background & Reporting Lending & Financial Insurance Fraud & Account Access HealthcareComing soon Housing Education
Government & public sector
Government & public sector Law enforcement Homeland & borders Immigration & visa Benefits & health Justice & defense State & local government
Industries overview →
Evidence Certification Certify Your AI
AVAAS · Evidence Reliability Screener

An algorithm produced the lead. A court will ask whether it can be trusted.

Facial recognition, license plate readers, gunshot detection, DNA mixture software, image enhancement. When AI-derived evidence helps identify a person or drive a charging decision, its reliability becomes a live question in the courtroom. This tool shows the admissibility exposure, what a defense challenge will target, and what a court will want on the record.

Free About 2 minutes No signup Private
This is a reliability aid, not legal advice. It maps how AI-derived evidence tends to be tested for admissibility and what supports a reliability showing. Standards vary by court and by technique, so confirm specifics with your own counsel.
The evidence Step 1 of 2
What AI-derived evidence are you relying on?

Select all that apply. This sets which reliability questions a court is likely to raise.

How is the AI output used in the case?
Is the output offered with a qualified expert who can explain and defend the method?
Which admissibility standard governs your court?
What reliability foundation do you have on file for the tool?

Select all that apply.

Has this technique been accepted or validated for this use in your courts?
Can the defense independently inspect how the tool reached this output?
Keep going, all free
Two more ways to see where you stand
Risk Mirror
AI Risk Mirror

See what has already gone wrong with AI in your field, including wrongful arrests tied to face recognition, with sources.

Open the tool →
Regulation Checker
AI Regulation Checker

See which AI rules apply to your agency or use, from federal guidance to state and biometric law.

Open the tool →

Exposure guidance shows the pressure. Certification is the evidence.

These free tools show you where you stand. AVAAS gives you documented, third-party evidence you can put in front of a regulator, a court, or a customer.

Certify Your AI →
Or email [email protected]